CIOs Frustrated by Growing AI Expectations
- Morgan Ellis

- Dec 11, 2025
- 2 min read

Many organizations are realizing a challenging reality: AI expectations are escalating more rapidly than internal processes can manage. Chief Information Officers are feeling this pressure the most.
Research from Salesforce indicates that CIOs are increasingly held accountable for all aspects of AI, from ethics to risk and ROI, often without clear ownership or sufficient resources. Essentially, those responsible for implementing AI are overwhelmed with new responsibilities.
So, how can you support your team to succeed without experiencing burnout?
Increasing Pressure from C-Suite Expectations
Executives often anticipate quick AI successes, but Salesforce's research reveals that job roles haven't been updated to align with these expectations. CIOs face an AI accountability burden that was never officially assigned but has become part of their everyday duties.
This reality also involves managing the complexities of AI adoption, including growing implementation needs, new infrastructure requirements, security, accuracy, compliance, and results. Leadership expects rapid progress while technology teams strive for stability.
Bridging this gap begins with discussions about budget, risk, and outcomes, not just enthusiasm for AI's potential.
Shadow AI Risk Amplifies CIO Stress
As leaders push for increased AI use, employees often utilize generative AI tools informally to expedite their work. This leads to a growing shadow AI risk, as employees share protected data, exposing the company to data leaks and breaches, while overburdened CIOs struggle to manage. CIOs end up tracking down unknown tools, inconsistent data paths, and unplanned processes that aren't scalable.
The risks of unrestricted access to AI tools are becoming more evident. Managing AI expectations requires treating AI governance as a company-wide responsibility, not the task of one overburdened department.
Managing Unplanned AI Costs
The gap between expectations and reality becomes clearer when expenses arise, as the costs of AI tools accumulate quickly. Infrastructure upgrades, model training, licensing, monitoring tools, and compliance workflows mean CIOs face escalating AI costs while being held accountable for demonstrating ROI.
IT governance pressure is increasing as well. Boards are asking more probing questions, lawmakers are introducing new regulations, and auditors demand stronger documentation. If governance expands but budgets don't, frustration is inevitable.
How to Embrace AI Without Overburdening Your CIO
If your company is delving deeper into AI, support your CIO and enhance outcomes by:
Updating job descriptions to include AI responsibilities. Make AI accountability explicit through a Chief AI Officer role or formally expand the CIO mandate with corresponding authority and budget.
Auditing shadow AI use. Establish strict guidelines on which tools employees can and cannot use.
Setting realistic expectations regarding cost, timelines, and performance. Bridge the C-suite expectation gap with quarterly discussions about what the company aims to achieve with AI and how to measure results.
When AI becomes integral to your operations, your leadership structure should reflect this change. AI expectations are not slowing down, and assuming your CIO can handle them all will lead to burnout of top talent and financial waste.







Comments